FAKEbook – Who’s on and who pretends to be

Political communication is a huge field that encompasses many technologies and strategies. Even one single medium can be used in a variety of ways.

For example, Facebook, is a social networking site allowing people to become “fans” of politicians. Barack Obama, John McCain, Sarah Palin, and many other politicians have these “fan pages.”

However, each of their pages vary because every fan page is run in a different way. John McCain updates his Facebook through his twitter account.

He often comments on politics, but also digresses when he mentions football or other Arizona sporting teams. During the passing of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, McCain used his twitter, and subsequently his Facebook to highlight the allocations he considered “earmarks.”

In the weeks surrounding discussion on the stimulus bill, McCain posted a “top ten list” of the projects in the bill. He counted down, and then introduced “the #1 project of the day... $165,000 for maple syrup research in Vermont.”

Sarah Palin utilizes the “Notes” feature on Facebook to reach her fans making her fan page somewhat like a blog. She promotes her book and gave her opinions on political topics such as oil drilling and veteran’s issues.

The president’s Facebook is quite different than the Palin and McCain pages. His “page is run by Organizing for America, the grassroots organization for President Obama's agenda for change” and not the president himself.

However, some posts on Obama’s site are worded as if they are coming from him directly. Last month there was a post that read, “From my family to yours — Happy Thanksgiving.”

With so many different communication approaches it is difficult to see what messages are directly from the politician, and what support groups produce.

Interview wirth student, Michael Sarcona

Instead of a traditional update, this blog post is in the form of a brief interview. I spoke to senior political science major, Michael Sarcona about how he gets the news.

Climate conference goes hi-tech

This week in Copenhagen the 15^th Annual United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP15) will be broadcast on the web.

The COP15 website states, “all official meetings and press conferences will be available live and on-demand in original languages and in English translation.”

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark even made a Facebook page for the event. The updates include a countdown to the conference and statements encouraging “fans” to watch the opening ceremonies.

So far, the COP15 twitter account, it has over 10,000 and 1,370 “tweets,” or updates.

The United Nations is utilizing the Internet at a great capacity, even hosting blogs, calendars, and a page for factual information in seven different languages.

However, technical advances have also lead to complications. Fox News reports that last week, e-mails leeks allegedly exposed some scientists who were “manipulating data on climate change.”

Although these leeks may have changed the political discussion, social networks continue to reach the world’s citizens.

Efforts like these show how countries and international groups effectively use social media to communicate.

Before the Internet: How did they do it?

This blog widely revolves around politicians and how they use the Internet. In order to understand the way politicians use Facebook, Twitter, and web sites today, it is necessary to understand where communication started.

Even before America was founded, politicians have been spreading propaganda. Instead of instant news feeds and AP wire reports, news was delivered in slower ways.

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists relied on newspapers, pamphlets, and word of mouth to reach people.

When the radio became popular, political speeches became a community event. Those who owned radios would invite their neighbors over to hear the program.

This marked the first time Americans could feel the President’s charisma (or lack there of) in their own household. President’s like Coolidge, Hoover, and Roosevelt utilized the radio to help ease the public and win re-election.

In the 1950s television burst onto the political scope and quickly became the most widely used outlet for political dialogue.

Television has even been deemed the key technology that broadened the President’s political power. It showed the candidate to millions of viewers and made him the star of the “political show.”

Since the Internet is a relatively new medium being used in politics, it will take time to measure the affects it has on governmental affairs.

Sources:

Technopoly by Neil Postman

History of Mass Communication: Six Information Revolutions by Irving Fang

Packaging the Presidency by Kathleen Hall Jamieson

Track the Tweets!

Our politicians are online. They have Facebook fan pages and YouTube channels, but a big tool for politicians is Twitter.

Politicians may seem more technologically advanced than ever, when in reality Twitter is a simple post and reply website.

Anyone can access this site from their computer or internet capable cell phone. Since most politicians carry PDAs with them everywhere, they always have access to the site.

Now, voters can see all the Tweets of most U.S. politicians without following them on their own stream.

TweetCongress allows users to see live updates from different politicians.

Most updates focus on governmental affairs, like the following post by John McCain: “Continue debate on my amendment to stop Medicare cuts – I encourage every senior to contact their Senators & AARP.”

However, a handful of McCain’s tweets are more casual, wishing everyone a happy Thanksgiving.

Like many politicians, John McCain is using Twitter to inform, persuade, and connect with voters.